Talk:Bridges v. Wixon
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bridges v. Wixon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that according to Frank Murphy (pictured), the "record in this case will stand forever as a monument to man's intolerance of man"?
Chetsford (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2025 (UTC).
- Note: Relevant discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Detention of Mahmoud Khalil. Bremps... 10:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
This article, created from a redirect on 13 March, is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and presentable. QPQ done. See my review at Template:Did you know nominations/Detention of Mahmoud Khalil about the proposed multi-hook. Tenpop421 (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles