Adiabatic connection fluctuation dissipation theorem
![]() | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(March 2025) |
In density functional theory (DFT) the adiabatic-connection fluctuation-dissipation theorem (ACFD)[1][2] is an exact formula for the Kohn–Sham correlation energy.[3][4] A connection between noninteracting electrons and interacting electrons (the adiabatic connection (AC)) is combined with the random density fluctuations of molecular or solid systems (fluctuation-dissipation (FD)). It is used as a tool in theoretical chemistry and quantum chemistry to approximate the electronic energy.
The theorem states
1 |
where is the Hartree kernel, the interacting dynamic response function, the dynamic Kohn–Sham (KS) response function from time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT).
History
[edit]The ACFD theorem in its modern form for density functional theory has been discovered independently by many researches such as D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew in 1975,[5] 1977[6] respectively, by J. Harris together with A. Griffin[7] and R. O. Jones[8] in 1974/75 and by O. Gunnarson and B. I. Lundqvist in 1976.[9] It has since gained interest more recently since 2010 in theoretical chemistry and quantum chemistry with increasing computational power.
Proof
[edit]Adiabatic-connection (AC) theorem
[edit]The adiabatic connection (AC)[12] is a perturbation theory along the electron–electron interaction with the coupling strength from the Kohn–Sham (KS) system of non-interacting electrons towards the real system of interacting electrons and given by the following pertubative Schrödinger equation
is the coupling-constant dependent many-body Hamiltonian. is the many-body kinetic energy operator with the Laplacian , where the indices correspond to the respective electron coordinates, is the local coupling-strength-dependent potential. Note there that is the Kohn–Sham (KS) potential, the external potential, i.e. electron-nuclei interaction, the Kohn–Sham (KS) Slater determinant, the real electronic ground state wave function, is the energy of the KS system, is the real electronic ground state energy. Thus accordingly for the many-body Kohn–Sham (KS) equation is obtained
while for the electronic Schrödinger equation is obtained within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation
The coupling-constant-dependent correlation energy is given as difference of the energy of the interacting system minus that of the artificial KS system in bra–ket notation
which can be simplified further with the fact, that the density along the adiabatic-connection stays fixed, and the locality of the potential (This also accounts for the derivative which hence cancel out) and apply the Hellmann–Feynman theorem[13][14] with differentiating the Hamiltonian
Lastly the fundamental theorem of calculus to obtain the correlation energy back is used, which completes the adiabatic-connection (AC) theorem
2 |
Fluctuation-dissipation (FD) theorem
[edit]The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, first proven by Herbert Callen and Theodore A. Welton in 1951,[15] can be reformulated in a modern way for density functional theory to incorporate random fluctuations in the density. The full proof in detail is rather complicated and given in reference.[2] Some key features will be pointed out here. The response functions are integrated along the frequencies
where is the density operator, a sum of Dirac delta functions, the indices correspond to the ground state, to excited states, letting the sum start from , rather than with the identity operator and with introducing the 2-electron pair density
after some tedious algebra obtains the fluctuation-dissipation (FD) theorem
3 |
Combination of the adiabatic-connection (AC) theorem eq. (2) with the fluctuation-dissipation (FD) theorem eq. (3) yields finally the adiabatic-connection fluctuation-dissipation (ACFD) theorem eq. (1).
Applications of the ACFD theorem within linear-response time-dependent density functional theory in the framework of the random phase approximation
[edit]Only the Kohn–Sham (KS) response function is explicitly known in terms of occupied (denotes as ) and unoccupied (denotes as ) Kohn–Sham (KS) orbitals and KS eigenvalues and is given by
The interacting response function is calculated from the Petersilka–Gossmann–Gross TDDFT Dyson equation[16]
4 |
while the exchange-correlation (xc) kernel dependens nonlinearly on the coupling strength and the Hartree (H) kernel linearly. Invoking the random phase approximation (RPA)[17][18][19] i.e. . That means approximating the Hartree-exchange-correlation (Hxc) kernel with the Hartree kernel or neglecting the exchange-correlation kernel entirely, one obtains the RPA correlation energy while introducing a basis set in matrix notation, if the TDDFT Dyson equation eq. (4) is plugged into the ACFD theorem eq. (1). The coupling constant integration can then be carried out analytically.
5 |
where the trace operator corresponds to carrying out the spatial integrations, the index stands for both occupied and unoccupied KS orbitals. Note here that the RPA correlation energy is a highy KS orbital-dependent functional and is one of the most sophisticated approximations to the correlation energy. It is mostly done in a post-SCF manner. That means the KS orbitals and eigenvalues from a preceding KS calculation such as a generalized gradient approximation like e.g. PBE or hybrid calculation like PBE0 and B3LYP are used.
References
[edit]- ^ Görling, A. (2019). "Hierarchies of methods towards the exact Kohn–Sham correlation energy based on the adiabatic-connection fluctuation-dissipation theorem". Physical Review B. 99 (23): 235120. Bibcode:2019PhRvB..99w5120G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235120.
- ^ a b Heßelmann, A.; Görling, A. (2011). "Random-phase approximation correlation methods for molecules and solids" (PDF). Molecular Physics. 109 (21): 2473–2500. Bibcode:2011MolPh.109.2473H. doi:10.1080/00268976.2011.614282.
- ^ Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. (1964). "Inhomogeneous Electron Gas". Physical Review. 136 (3B): B864. Bibcode:1964PhRv..136..864H. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864.
- ^ Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. (1965). "Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects". Physical Review. 140 (4A): A1133. Bibcode:1965PhRv..140.1133K. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133.
- ^ Langreth, D. C.; Perdew, J. P. (1975). "The exchange-correlation energy of a metallic surface". Solid State Communications. 17 (11): 1425–1429. Bibcode:1975SSCom..17.1425L. doi:10.1016/0038-1098(75)90618-3.
- ^ Langreth, D. C.; Perdew, J. P. (1977). "Exchange-correlation energy of a metallic surface: Wave-vector analysis". Physical Review B. 15 (6): 2884–2901. Bibcode:1977PhRvB..15.2884L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.15.2884.
- ^ Harris, J.; Griffin, A. (1975). "Correlation energy and van der Waals interaction of coupled metal films". Physical Review B. 11 (10): 3669–3677. Bibcode:1975PhRvB..11.3669H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.11.3669.
- ^ Harris, J.; Jones, R. O. (1974). "The surface energy of a bounded electron gas". Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics. 4 (8): 1170–1186. Bibcode:1974JPhF....4.1170H. doi:10.1088/0305-4608/4/8/013.
- ^ Gunnarson, O.; Lundqvist, B. I. (1976). "Exchange and correlation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin-density-functional formalism". Physical Review B. 13 (10): 4274–4298. Bibcode:1976PhRvB..13.4274G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274.
- ^ Görling, A.; Levy, M. (1993). "Correlation-energy functional and its high-density limit obtained from a coupling-constant perturbation expansion". Physical Review B. 47 (20): 13105–13113. Bibcode:1993PhRvB..4713105G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.47.13105. PMID 10005612.
- ^ Görling, A.; Levy, M. (1994). "Exact Kohn–Sham scheme based on perturbation theory". Physical Review A. 50 (1): 196–204. Bibcode:1994PhRvA..50..196G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.50.196. PMID 9910882.
- ^ Teale, A. M.; Coriani, S.; Helgaker, T. (2010). "Accurate calculation and modeling of the adiabatic connection in density functional theory". Journal of Chemical Physics. 132 (16): 164115. Bibcode:2010JChPh.132p4115T. doi:10.1063/1.3380834. PMID 20441266.
- ^ Hellmann, H (1937). Einführung in die Quantenchemie. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke. p. 285. OL 21481721M.
- ^ Feynman, R. P. (1939). "Forces in Molecules". Physical Review. 56 (4): 340–343. Bibcode:1939PhRv...56..340F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.340. S2CID 121972425.
- ^ H.B. Callen; T.A. Welton (1951). "Irreversibility and Generalized Noise". Physical Review. 83 (1): 34–40. Bibcode:1951PhRv...83...34C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.83.34.
- ^ Petersilka, M.; U. J. Gossmann; E.K.U. Gross (1996). "Excitation Energies from Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory". Physical Review Letters. 76 (8): 1212–1215. arXiv:cond-mat/0001154. Bibcode:1996PhRvL..76.1212P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1212. PMID 10061664.
- ^ Bohm, David; Pines, David (1 May 1951). "A Collective Description of Electron Interactions. I. Magnetic Interactions". Physical Review. 82 (5). American Physical Society (APS): 625–634. Bibcode:1951PhRv...82..625B. doi:10.1103/physrev.82.625. ISSN 0031-899X.
- ^ Pines, David; Bohm, David (15 January 1952). "A Collective Description of Electron Interactions: II. CollectivevsIndividual Particle Aspects of the Interactions". Physical Review. 85 (2). American Physical Society (APS): 338–353. Bibcode:1952PhRv...85..338P. doi:10.1103/physrev.85.338. ISSN 0031-899X.
- ^ Bohm, David; Pines, David (1 October 1953). "A Collective Description of Electron Interactions: III. Coulomb Interactions in a Degenerate Electron Gas". Physical Review. 92 (3). American Physical Society (APS): 609–625. Bibcode:1953PhRv...92..609B. doi:10.1103/physrev.92.609. ISSN 0031-899X.